Ven. Thich Huyen Quang
Ven. Thich Quang Do
2017-02-16 | VCHR
Death Penalty: Vietnam is the World’s 5th Worst Executioner
2017-01-30 | IBIB
In Lunar New Year Message, Thích Quảng Độ calls for Fearlessness to win freedom for Buddhism in Vietnam
2017-01-24 | The Observatory
The Observatory: Viet Nam: Arbitrary detention of labour and land rights defender Ms. Tran Thi Nga
2016-12-07 | VCHR
EU must press Vietnam to address serious human rights violations at upcoming human rights dialogue
2016-11-19 | VCHR
Vietnam New Law contravenes the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief
54 Religious organisations and CSOs call on Vietnam National Assembly to revise Draft Law on Religion and Belief
PARIS 6 October 2016 (VCHR) – 54 prominent religious and civil society organisations in Vietnam, the USA, Europe and Asia have sent an Open Letter to the President of Vietnam’s National Assembly, Ms. Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan, calling for the revision of the Draft Law on Belief and Religion which should be voted by the National Assembly at their upcoming session (20 October - 18 November 2016). The signatories say the law is seriously flawed, and call for a revised text to be drafted in consultation with religious organisations and international legal experts “to ensure that the law protects the right to freedom of religion or belief in line with article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)”.
“This law, if adopted in its current form, will put a straight-jacket on religions” said VCHR President Vo Van Ai, one of the letters’ co-sponsors. “It legalises government interference into all aspects of religious life, and rejects the very existence of organisations which cannot, or do not want to register with the State. This is against the very principle of freedom of religion or belief enshrined in the ICCPR, to which Vietnam is a state party”.
According to the signatories, the draft law places “unacceptable restrictions on the right to freedom of religion or belief and other human rights”, and “inherit[s] from previous rules and regulations this emphasis on government control and management of religious life which is contrary to the spirit and principle of the right to freedom of religion and belief”.
This is the first time Vietnam will adopt a law on religion and belief. Until now, religions have been regulated by a series of ordinances and decrees. Previous versions of the draft, which were circulated to religious communities for comment by the Government Committee for Religious Affairs, sparked off strongly critical reactions. However, the current text has taken no account of the religious communities’ concerns. Moreover, apart from the Catholic Church, which has a special status in Vietnam, only State-recognised or State-sponsored religious bodies were consulted, not independent organisations such as the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV) and non-recognised Christian, Cao Dai, Hoa Hao and Khmer Krom Buddhist communities.
to the President of the Vietnam National Assembly
on Vietnam’s draft Law on Belief and Religion
The Hon. Nguyen Thi Kim Ngan
President, National Assembly of Vietnam
Doc Lap Street, Quan Thanh
Ba Dinh, Hanoi
Dear National Assembly President Nguyen Kim Ngân,
We, the undersigned civil society organizations, are writing to express our concerns about the proposed Law on Belief and Religion in Vietnam. The draft law, which has been revised several times and drawn strong criticism from many religious communities, is expected to be voted into law by the National Assembly at its session in October-November 2016.
The most recent draft was discussed at a high-level meeting of the Communist Party’s Fatherland Front on 17 August, and circulated to certain religious communities for comment. An examination of the draft law that was published on the National Assembly website shows that the 9-chapter draft law contains some improvements, but also continues to place unacceptable restrictions on the right to freedom of religion or belief and other human rights. Specifically, basic guarantees of the right to freedom of religion or belief continue to be undermined by onerous registration requirements and excessive state interference in religious organizations’ internal affairs. Indeed, this and the previous versions of the law inherit from previous rules and regulations this emphasis on government control and management of religious life which is contrary to the spirit and principle of the right to freedom of religion or belief.
As mentioned above, the draft was circulated to certain religious communities for comment. However, one Catholic body also objected to the short time, from 18 to 30 August, given for preparing their response to the draft law (1). Furthermore, independent religious groups not registered with the government, such as the United Buddhist Church of Vietnam, were not consulted.
There have been some welcome improvements made in the draft law, including provisions for the right to change one’s religion, as well as to follow or not follow a religion, the right of some detainees "to use religious books and manifest their belief or religion”, and the right of religious organizations to participate in activities such as education, vocational training, medical care and social and humanitarian assistance.
Nevertheless, the recommendations below have emerged from some of the particular concerns expressed by religious communities in Vietnam, which are shared by the undersigned organisations.
1. The definition of a religion should be made consistent with Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
For these reasons, we strongly urge that the law be revised, in consultation with religious community representatives, including those of non-recognized religious communities, and experts in international human rights law, to ensure that the law protects the right to freedom of religion or belief in line with article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
In the current draft, a religious organization has been defined as “a group of people … which is recognized by the government” (our emphasis) (Article 2.13). This leaves members of religious organizations who cannot or choose not to register with the authorities in a legal limbo, with no legal safeguards for conducting religious activities.
2. Registration with the government should not be made a pre-requisite for the exercise of freedom of religion or belief.
The onerous and complex registration process requires approval from the authorities for religious activities, operations and status as an organization. The guarantees outlined in Article 18 of the ICCPR are independent of and cannot be conditioned on any domestic process of notification, authorisation, recognition or registration.
3. The law must not allow officials to arbitrarily interfere in the internal affairs of religious organizations.
Provisions in the law allow the authorities to interfere excessively in the internal decisions, appointments, training, teachings and programmes of religious organisations. Limitations on the manifestation of freedom of religion or belief must never exceed in either purpose or scope those permitted in article 18(3) of the ICCPR. As the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Dr. Heiner Bielefeltd, said after his visit to Vietnam in 2014, “…registration should be an offer by the State but not a compulsory legal requirement.”
4. Ambiguous and potentially discriminatory language should be removed.
The draft law contains ambiguous language regarding “good traditional cultural values” (Article 10.1) and “sowing division” (Article 5.4), that could be used to discriminate against ethnic and indigenous minorities, independent groups and those whose religion or belief is seen as “foreign” (Article 2.12).
5. Provisions should be made to establish legal channels and mechanisms for people to file complaints, and have those complaints independently investigated and acted on, in cases of alleged violations of the right to freedom of religion or belief.
We look forward to hearing from you about this important matter. Please reply to the VCHR coordinator Penelope Faulkner at firstname.lastname@example.org or the CSW coordinator Benedict Rogers at email@example.com.
East Asia Team Leader, Christian Solidarity Worldwide
Vo Van Ai
President, Vietnam Committee on Human Rights
Director of Southeast Asia and Pacific Programme, Amnesty International
Deputy Director, Asia Division, Human Rights Watch
Director, Hudson Institute Center for Religious Freedom
Hans Aage Gravaas
Secretary General, Stefanus Alliance International
Executive Director, Civil Rights Defenders
Jostein Hole Kobbeltvedt
Executive Director, Rafto Foundation for Human Rights
Nguyen Dinh Thang
CEO & President, BPSOS
Executive Director, Hawai'i Institute for Human Rights
Ven. Thich Thanh Quang
President, Executive Institute, Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam
Lê Cong Cau
Chairman, Buddhist Youth Movement of Vietnam (GDPTVN)
Ven. Thich Huyen Viet
Chargé d’Affaires, Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam Overseas
Nguyen Van Lia
The Traditional Hoa Hao Buddhist Bloc
Tran Ngoc Suong
The Popular Council of Cao Dai Religion
Charles Santiago MP
Chairperson, ASEAN Parliamentarians for Human Rights (APHR)
Professor the Lord Alton of Liverpool
Member, UK All-Party Parliamentary Group on International Religious Freedom or Belief
Acting President, Freedom House
President, Agir Ensemble pour les Droits de l’Homme
Executive Director, Jubilee Campaign USA
The 21st Century Wilberforce Initiative
Faith J. H. McDonnell
Director, Religious Liberty Program, The Institute on Religion and Democracy
President and Founder, Southeast Asia Monitor for Human Rights and Justice
Director, Human Rights Without Frontiers
Vu Quoc Dung
VETO! Human Rights Defenders‘ Network
Former US Congressman Joseph Cao
Chairman, Coalition for a Free and Democratic Vietnam
Executive Director, Montagnard Assistance Project
Chairman, Con Dau Parishioners Association
Overseas Representative, Popular Council of Cao Dai Religion
Chairman, Montagnard Human Rights Organization
Pastor A Ga
Representative, Montagnard Evangelical Church of Christ
Vũ Quốc Ngữ
CEO, Defend the Defenders
Huỳnh Thục Vy
Coordinator, Vietnamese Women for Human Rights
Chairwoman, Women for Human Rights in Vietnam
Nguyen Bac Truyen
Vietnamese Political and Religious Prisoners’ Friendship Association
Vietnam Independent Civil Society Organizations Network (VICSON)
President, International Campaign for Tibet
Founder and President, China Aid
Human Rights in China (HRIC)
Executive Director, China Labour Bulletin
Secretary General, Taiwan Association for Human Rights
Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi
Adilur Rahman Khan
Secretary, Odhikar, Bangladesh
Amnesty International USA Group 56
Amnesty International Group USA Group 524
Michael De Dora
Director of Public Policy, Center for Inquiry
Co-founder, Campaign to Abolish Torture in Vietnam
Advocacy Director, International Christian Concern
Chairwoman, Committee for Religious Freedom in Vietnam
Nguyen Thanh Dung
Association for Promotion of Freedom of Religions and Beliefs
Vietnamese FoRB Roundtable
Coordinator, Burma Partnership
Secretary General, Norwegian Helsinki Committee
(1) Letter On Behalf of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Vietnam, signed by Bishop Peter Nguyen Van Kham, Deputy Secretary-general http://gpquinhon.org/qn/news/GIAO-HOI-VIET-NAM/Thu-cua-HDGMVN-gop-y-Du-thao-Luat-Tin-nguong-Ton-giao-5238/#.V9AIDzUSb55